Administrative Sciences

Climate change threatens the future of the next generations and is already causing widespread destruction in the present through an increasing number of natural disasters. A new model of production and consumption based on sustainability is required, especially in the fashion industry—the second most polluting sector in the world. Therefore, in order to determine whether these companies contribute to people’s and the planet’s well-being, it is necessary to understand their practices. To this end, we analyse the sustainable practices of the sector by studying the ten most responsible fashion companies according to the BoF Sustainability Index, that is based on the methodology of content analysis applied to case studies. To do this, we have defined a taxonomy of the ten most common sustainability strategies and practices: stakeholder engagement, strong governance and transparency, decarbonisation, biodiversity conservation and restoration, circularity, reducing waste and pollution from the use of plastics, eliminating hazardous chemicals, preserving water quality, diversity, equity and inclusion policies, supply chain responsibility, and supporting the communities in which companies operate. The results show that major business groups have integrated axes into their sustainability strategies that address the industry’s primary social and environmental challenges. These plans are based on ambitious goals that go beyond stakeholder demands and the generation of economic benefits.

One of the most important priorities of the most recent research work regarding the professional appraisal (PA) process is to understand different aspects of the social workers’ satisfaction with this particular type of professional evaluation. In this sense, this study addresses the imperative to comprehensively understand social workers’ satisfaction with PA, a pivotal yet sensitive human resource instrument within public administration. Drawing on a sociological survey of social workers in Romania’s North-West Development Region, the research empirically validated a multidimensional theoretical model of PA satisfaction (PAS) through rigorous exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The findings definitively establish that PAS is not a unidimensional construct, but rather a complex phenomenon underpinned by three distinct dimensions: (1) satisfaction with the most recent performance rating; (2) satisfaction with the appraisal system; and (3) satisfaction with the rater. This validated model significantly advances the conceptualization of satisfaction regarding PA, providing a precise diagnostic instrument for identifying systemic inefficiencies. Consequently, it offers a strategic framework for targeted organizational interventions and informs the development of more equitable and growth-oriented public policies. The study highlights that holistic measurement across these identified dimensions is crucial for cultivating employee motivation, reinforcing organizational justice, and fostering sustainable professional development within the public sector.

This study systematically reviews 53 peer-reviewed articles on public sector innovation published between 2021 and 2025 to synthesize knowledge on how innovation is conceptualized, triggered, enacted, and constrained. Findings reveal that innovation is framed across technological, organizational, governance, and social dimensions, reflecting substantial conceptual and theoretical diversity. Key triggers include digital transformation, leadership, inter-organizational collaboration, fiscal pressures, and workforce capabilities, with emphasis shifting toward technology, human capital, and collaboration in recent years. Innovation produces both positive outcomes, such as improved service quality, efficiency, and citizen engagement, and negative or unintended consequences, including implementation failures, equity concerns, and employee resistance. Persistent barriers, such as bureaucratic rigidity, risk-averse culture, accountability pressures, and political interference, operate as structural conditions rather than isolated obstacles. Theoretical foundations remain fragmented, with New Public Management, New Public Governance, institutional theory, and public value theory applied inconsistently. These findings underscore the need for integrative, context-sensitive approaches that combine institutional, human, and technological perspectives to guide innovation effectively. The review offers actionable insights for public managers and policymakers, emphasizing alignment with organizational capacity, leadership, and regulatory design, and highlights directions for future research to advance theory, practice, and policy in public sector innovation.